Tahj Eaddy
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2293:50 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 84
- Minutes per game
- 27:18
- Points per game
- 10.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.9 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 911 | 201 | 199 | 71 | 2 | 136 | 118 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 317–755 | 42.0% | 9.0 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 183–392 | 46.7% | 4.7 | 6.8 |
| 3P | 134–363 | 36.9% | 4.3 | 6.3 |
| FT | 143–169 | 84.6% | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.9% | 54.9% | 48.1% | 22.4% | 1.46 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Tahj Eaddy | SE Missouri St | 25 | 22:17 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 13.9 | 43.0% | 91.2% | 52.2% |
| 2019 Tahj Eaddy | Santa Clara | 12 | 31:21 | 14.6 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 18.6 | 34.8% | 89.5% | 54.4% |
| 2020 Tahj Eaddy | Santa Clara | 27 | 25:38 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 15.5 | 34.2% | 80.4% | 55.5% |
| 2021 Tahj Eaddy | USC | 20 | 33:25 | 13.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 16.5 | 36.5% | 80.4% | 56.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.5 | +1.2 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | +0.7 | Not computed for this season | 2,287 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Santa Clara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -1.2 | Not computed for this season | 2,441 | ||
| 2019 | Santa Clara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.4 | -0.2 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.0 | Not computed for this season | 613 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology