Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Grant Golden

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

3002:58 minutes logged

Games logged
108
Minutes per game
27:48
Points per game
14.4
Rebounds / assists per game
6.4 / 3.1
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game14.46.43.10.50.82.21.9
Per 40 minutes20.79.24.50.71.13.22.7
Season totals15516923355085238200
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG638–124251.4%11.516.5
2P585–107054.7%9.914.3
3P53–17230.8%1.62.3
FT222–32668.1%3.04.3
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
53.5%56.0%13.8%26.2%1.41

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2017 Grant GoldenRichmond 5Few games9:571.82.00.87.20.0%†50.0%†34.9%†
2018 Grant GoldenRichmond 2330:1515.96.82.021.027.3%62.0%53.6%
2019 Grant GoldenRichmond 1831:5316.46.24.120.627.6%†71.1%55.5%
2020 Grant GoldenRichmond 1926:4913.87.63.820.623.1%†75.4%53.7%
2021 Grant GoldenRichmond 1526:3214.06.03.321.153.8%†63.3%62.8%
2022 Grant GoldenRichmond 2827:4314.66.43.221.133.3%67.1%57.7%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2022RichmondNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+3.5+2.1 to +4.6Sufficient evidence+1.8+1.7Not computed for this season2,586
2021RichmondNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+2.2+1.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+1.6+0.6Not computed for this season1,3392020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag.
2020RichmondNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+3.1+2.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence+2.3+0.9Not computed for this season1,746
2019RichmondNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection-0.3-1.6 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+1.6-1.9Not computed for this season1,810
2018RichmondNone: no budget that season—training: in model fit-1.2-2.0 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+0.3-1.4Not computed for this season2,443
2017Not applicableNone: no budget that season—training: in model fitNo model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.Not applicable

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology