Trey Landers
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2181:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 81
- Minutes per game
- 26:56
- Points per game
- 9.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.2 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.4 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 761 | 503 | 161 | 69 | 31 | 121 | 203 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 299–543 | 55.1% | 6.7 | 10.0 |
| 2P | 263–412 | 63.8% | 5.1 | 7.6 |
| 3P | 36–131 | 27.5% | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| FT | 127–189 | 67.2% | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.4% | 60.8% | 24.1% | 34.8% | 1.33 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Trey Landers | Dayton | 7Few games | 5:00 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 20.6 | 50.0%† | 60.0%† | 88.2%† |
| 2018 Trey Landers | Dayton | 23 | 30:04 | 11.5 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 15.3 | 37.8%† | 73.1% | 66.7% |
| 2019 Trey Landers | Dayton | 26 | 28:20 | 8.7 | 6.9 | 2.2 | 12.3 | 18.4%† | 71.9% | 55.9% |
| 2020 Trey Landers | Dayton | 25 | 28:45 | 10.1 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 14.1 | 25.9% | 60.0% | 58.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +4.6 | +3.1 to +5.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.8 | +1.8 | Not computed for this season | 2,464 | ||
| 2019 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.1 | +0.1 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +0.6 | Not computed for this season | 2,404 | ||
| 2018 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.2 | -0.7 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 2,339 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology