Jordy Tshimanga
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1100:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 79
- Minutes per game
- 13:56
- Points per game
- 4.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.5 | 4.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.0 | 12.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 7.6 |
| Season totals | 358 | 339 | 30 | 26 | 40 | 105 | 210 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 145–276 | 52.5% | 3.5 | 10.0 |
| 2P | 145–273 | 53.1% | 3.5 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 0–3 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 68–123 | 55.3% | 1.6 | 4.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.5% | 54.2% | 1.1% | 44.6% | 0.29 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Jordy Tshimanga | Nebraska | 24 | 12:35 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 13.8 | — | 59.1% | 44.7%† |
| 2018 Jordy Tshimanga | Nebraska | 18 | 14:34 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 13.3 | — | 56.5%† | 53.6%† |
| 2020 Jordy Tshimanga | Dayton | 23 | 9:34 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 13.5 | — | 50.0%† | 66.6%† |
| 2021 Jordy Tshimanga | Dayton | 14 | 22:38 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 0.4 | 11.7 | 0.0%† | 53.1% | 60.3%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.9 | +1.7 to +3.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +2.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,016 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.6 | +0.5 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.5 | Not computed for this season | 763 | ||
| 2018 | Nebraska | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +1.7 | +0.5 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +2.3 | Not computed for this season | 881 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology