Jacob Young
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2965:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 127
- Minutes per game
- 23:21
- Points per game
- 9.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.2 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 1203 | 249 | 260 | 132 | 6 | 226 | 200 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 453–1089 | 41.6% | 8.6 | 14.7 |
| 2P | 340–707 | 48.1% | 5.6 | 9.5 |
| 3P | 113–382 | 29.6% | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| FT | 184–264 | 69.7% | 2.1 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 49.9% | 35.1% | 24.2% | 1.15 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Jacob Young | Texas | 23 | 16:13 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 10.4 | 22.8% | 80.0%† | 38.4% |
| 2018 Jacob Young | Texas | 22 | 15:48 | 6.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 15.6 | 31.9% | 72.2%† | 51.5% |
| 2020 Jacob Young | Rutgers | 25 | 20:58 | 8.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 16.7 | 28.8% | 63.2% | 47.6% |
| 2021 Jacob Young | Rutgers | 25 | 29:47 | 13.9 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 18.7 | 37.7% | 75.6% | 54.5% |
| 2022 Jacob Young | Oregon | 32 | 30:30 | 12.6 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 16.5 | 28.1% | 67.3% | 50.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -0.7 | Not computed for this season | 3,232 | ||
| 2021 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.2 | -1.0 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 2,563 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
| 2020 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,761 | ||
| 2018 | Texas | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.5 | -0.3 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,152 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology