Austin Vereen
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1039:31 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 58
- Minutes per game
- 17:55
- Points per game
- 4.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.9 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 283 | 148 | 36 | 38 | 9 | 45 | 107 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 89–250 | 35.6% | 4.3 | 9.6 |
| 2P | 33–102 | 32.4% | 1.8 | 3.9 |
| 3P | 56–148 | 37.8% | 2.6 | 5.7 |
| FT | 49–68 | 72.1% | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 50.6% | 59.2% | 27.2% | 0.80 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Austin Vereen | VMI | 14 | 16:41 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 8.7 | 38.5%† | 55.6%† | 51.0%† |
| 2017 Austin Vereen | VMI | 11Under 100 minutes | 6:00 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 9.7 | 33.3%† | 100.0%† | 50.4%† |
| 2018 Austin Vereen | VMI | 15 | 28:21 | 9.9 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 13.9 | 36.8% | 72.2% | 50.1% |
| 2020 Austin Vereen | Pacific | 18 | 17:29 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 8.6 | 43.5%† | 76.2%† | 51.3%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Pacific | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.7 | -2.9 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -2.1 | Not computed for this season | 1,066 | ||
| 2018 | VMI | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -1.7 | -3.0 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -1.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,382 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology