Andrew Fleming
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1074:18 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 79
- Minutes per game
- 13:36
- Points per game
- 4.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.7 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 369 | 140 | 69 | 24 | 8 | 91 | 88 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 129–322 | 40.1% | 4.1 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 87–188 | 46.3% | 2.4 | 7.0 |
| 3P | 42–134 | 31.3% | 1.7 | 5.0 |
| FT | 69–95 | 72.6% | 1.2 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.6% | 50.7% | 41.6% | 29.5% | 0.76 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Andrew Fleming | Iowa | 8Few games | 6:15 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 13.6 | 28.6%† | 83.3%† | 54.3%† |
| 2018 Andrew Fleming | Lipscomb | 26 | 7:50 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 16.3 | 22.2%† | 69.0% | 45.4%† |
| 2019 Andrew Fleming | Lipscomb | 22 | 9:42 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 13.7 | 43.3%† | 71.4%† | 54.3%† |
| 2020 Andrew Fleming | Lipscomb | 23 | 26:24 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 12.9 | 30.0% | 75.8% | 51.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -2.1 | -2.9 to -1.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -1.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,890 | ||
| 2019 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.5 | -1.5 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.6 | Not computed for this season | 695 | ||
| 2018 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -2.7 | -3.6 to -1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.8 | -0.8 | Not computed for this season | 772 | ||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology