Daniel Giddens
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
985:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 71
- Minutes per game
- 13:53
- Points per game
- 3.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.7 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.2 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.1 | 7.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 7.2 |
| Season totals | 225 | 191 | 23 | 18 | 76 | 71 | 177 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 88–190 | 46.3% | 2.7 | 7.7 |
| 2P | 88–189 | 46.6% | 2.7 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 49–93 | 52.7% | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.3% | 48.7% | 0.5% | 48.9% | 0.32 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Daniel Giddens | Ohio St | 19 | 16:57 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 8.8 | 0.0%† | 48.6% | 43.1%† |
| 2018 Daniel Giddens | Alabama | 25 | 12:19 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 10.8 | — | 57.6% | 52.9%† |
| 2019 Daniel Giddens | Alabama | 8Few games | 9:37 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 7.3 | — | 44.4%† | 35.1%† |
| 2020 Daniel Giddens | Vermont | 19 | 14:41 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 8.2 | — | 56.3%† | 57.0%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Vermont | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | +0.6 | Not computed for this season | 876 | ||
| 2019 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2018 | Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -1.5 | -2.7 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.8 | +0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,088 | ||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology