Marvin Prochet
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1662:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 51
- Minutes per game
- 32:35
- Points per game
- 11.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.1 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.5 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.1 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 587 | 360 | 91 | 43 | 49 | 56 | 108 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 196–479 | 40.9% | 9.4 | 11.5 |
| 2P | 101–245 | 41.2% | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 95–234 | 40.6% | 4.6 | 5.6 |
| FT | 100–136 | 73.5% | 2.7 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.8% | 54.5% | 48.9% | 28.4% | 1.63 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Marvin Prochet | Niagara | 2Few games | 35:56 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 12.2 | 50.0%† | 75.0%† | 55.7%† |
| 2017 Marvin Prochet | Niagara | 4Few games | 33:12 | 10.3 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 12.3 | 40.0%† | 100.0%† | 55.1%† |
| 2018 Marvin Prochet | Niagara | 27 | 32:16 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 11.1 | 33.7% | 74.1% | 50.9% |
| 2019 Marvin Prochet | Niagara | 18 | 32:34 | 15.7 | 6.7 | 1.9 | 19.2 | 46.8% | 71.0% | 57.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.3 | -0.5 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | -2.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,997 | ||
| 2018 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +1.3 | +0.3 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -0.7 | Not computed for this season | 2,984 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology