Nick Perkins
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2535:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 103
- Minutes per game
- 24:37
- Points per game
- 13.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.1 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.3 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 1349 | 622 | 60 | 32 | 67 | 191 | 269 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 486–1076 | 45.2% | 10.4 | 17.0 |
| 2P | 375–741 | 50.6% | 7.2 | 11.7 |
| 3P | 111–335 | 33.1% | 3.3 | 5.3 |
| FT | 266–379 | 70.2% | 3.7 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.3% | 54.3% | 31.1% | 35.2% | 0.31 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Nick Perkins | Buffalo | 26 | 19:04 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 0.2 | 15.7 | 32.9% | 63.6% | 52.7% |
| 2017 Nick Perkins | Buffalo | 20 | 25:16 | 12.1 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 19.2 | 26.4% | 59.7% | 48.7% |
| 2018 Nick Perkins | Buffalo | 31 | 27:21 | 16.4 | 6.1 | 0.8 | 24.0 | 31.6% | 77.2% | 56.1% |
| 2019 Nick Perkins | Buffalo | 26 | 26:25 | 15.6 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 23.6 | 39.8% | 70.1% | 56.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Buffalo | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.9 | +0.7 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | -0.6 | Not computed for this season | 2,473 | ||
| 2018 | Buffalo | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -1.4 | Not computed for this season | 3,122 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016, 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology