Devin Cannady
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1973:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 63
- Minutes per game
- 31:19
- Points per game
- 13.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.0 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.3 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.0 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 841 | 253 | 107 | 74 | 11 | 84 | 131 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 263–653 | 40.3% | 10.4 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 119–256 | 46.5% | 4.1 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 144–397 | 36.3% | 6.3 | 8.0 |
| FT | 171–189 | 90.5% | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.3% | 57.1% | 60.8% | 28.9% | 1.27 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Devin Cannady | Princeton | 21 | 21:41 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 20.4 | 40.7% | 88.7% | 64.3% |
| 2017 Devin Cannady | Princeton | 17 | 33:09 | 11.7 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 14.1 | 30.8% | 93.3% | 51.4% |
| 2018 Devin Cannady | Princeton | 16 | 38:34 | 15.8 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 16.3 | 37.6% | 89.2% | 56.4% |
| 2019 Devin Cannady | Princeton | 9Few games | 37:28 | 17.6 | 5.4 | 1.9 | 18.7 | 36.7% | 90.0% | 56.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -0.5 | Not computed for this season | 1,182 | ||
| 2018 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -0.5 | -1.5 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -1.1 | Not computed for this season | 2,046 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016, 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology