Everson Davis
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1550:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 68
- Minutes per game
- 22:48
- Points per game
- 6.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.3 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.0 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| Season totals | 427 | 237 | 117 | 42 | 13 | 114 | 151 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 147–427 | 34.4% | 6.3 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 128–342 | 37.4% | 5.0 | 8.8 |
| 3P | 19–85 | 22.4% | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| FT | 114–169 | 67.5% | 2.5 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.7% | 42.6% | 19.9% | 39.6% | 1.03 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Everson Davis | Binghamton | 23 | 27:48 | 8.2 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 11.8 | 16.7%† | 69.2% | 39.9% |
| 2017 Everson Davis | Binghamton | 19 | 16:53 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 11.8 | 20.0%† | 68.0% | 42.0%† |
| 2018 Everson Davis | Binghamton | 20 | 22:58 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 11.0 | 42.1%† | 68.0% | 50.0% |
| 2019 Everson Davis | Binghamton | 6Few games | 21:52 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 0.0%† | 25.0%† | 33.0%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.3 | -1.7 to -0.8 | Limited evidence | -1.4 | +0.1 | Not computed for this season | 435 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
| 2018 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -0.9 | -1.8 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,491 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2016, 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology