D.J. Foreman
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1554:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 77
- Minutes per game
- 20:11
- Points per game
- 6.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.1 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.0 | 8.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 4.7 |
| Season totals | 466 | 320 | 51 | 25 | 28 | 125 | 183 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 177–337 | 52.5% | 4.4 | 8.7 |
| 2P | 174–330 | 52.7% | 4.3 | 8.5 |
| 3P | 3–7 | 42.9%† | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| FT | 109–214 | 50.9% | 2.8 | 5.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.0% | 54.0% | 2.1% | 63.5% | 0.41 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 D.J. Foreman | Rutgers | 17 | 14:38 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 11.1 | 25.0%† | 58.3%† | 51.1%† |
| 2016 D.J. Foreman | Rutgers | 12 | 26:40 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 10.7 | 100.0%† | 45.8% | 46.2%† |
| 2018 D.J. Foreman | St Louis | 21 | 19:35 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 14.2 | — | 50.0% | 63.1%† |
| 2019 D.J. Foreman | St Louis | 27 | 21:16 | 6.1 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 0.0%† | 52.9% | 53.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | St Louis | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.3 | -2.8 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.6 | +0.3 | Not computed for this season | 1,839 | ||
| 2018 | St Louis | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -0.1 | -1.3 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +0.1 | Not computed for this season | 1,320 | ||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2015 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2015, 2016. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology