Amir Bell
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2167:36 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 73
- Minutes per game
- 29:42
- Points per game
- 9.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.7 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 688 | 263 | 187 | 65 | 37 | 103 | 216 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 244–527 | 46.3% | 7.2 | 9.7 |
| 2P | 180–342 | 52.6% | 4.7 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 64–185 | 34.6% | 2.5 | 3.4 |
| FT | 136–212 | 64.2% | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.4% | 55.5% | 35.1% | 40.2% | 1.82 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Amir Bell | Princeton | 19 | 28:26 | 8.3 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 11.6 | 30.4%† | 61.3% | 57.7% |
| 2016 Amir Bell | Princeton | 21 | 28:19 | 9.4 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 13.3 | 40.3% | 62.3% | 56.5% |
| 2017 Amir Bell | Princeton | 17 | 25:41 | 7.9 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 12.4 | 31.8%† | 76.0% | 56.3% |
| 2018 Amir Bell | Princeton | 16 | 37:15 | 12.4 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 13.3 | 32.1% | 64.4% | 52.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +1.3 | +0.7 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,973 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2015 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2015, 2016, 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology