Jordan Reed
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1729:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 68
- Minutes per game
- 25:26
- Points per game
- 6.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.4 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 451 | 144 | 86 | 41 | 5 | 99 | 130 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 146–435 | 33.6% | 6.4 | 10.1 |
| 2P | 52–145 | 35.9% | 2.1 | 3.4 |
| 3P | 94–290 | 32.4% | 4.3 | 6.7 |
| FT | 65–76 | 85.5% | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.4% | 48.1% | 66.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Jordan Reed | Rice | 9Few games | 1:47 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0%† | — | 0.0%† |
| 2017 Jordan Reed | New Hampshire | 23 | 28:04 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 7.7 | 32.6% | 78.3%† | 46.2% |
| 2018 Jordan Reed | New Hampshire | 18 | 27:00 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 10.3 | 29.3% | 80.0%† | 43.9% |
| 2019 Jordan Reed | New Hampshire | 18 | 32:19 | 11.2 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 13.9 | 36.8% | 90.7% | 54.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | New Hampshire | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.3 | -2.1 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | -0.1 | Not computed for this season | 1,815 | ||
| 2018 | New Hampshire | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -0.5 | -1.5 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 1,629 | ||
| 2017 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2015 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2017. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology