Troy Harper
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1719:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 70
- Minutes per game
- 24:34
- Points per game
- 12.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.7 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 3.9 |
| Season totals | 848 | 159 | 101 | 42 | 6 | 139 | 166 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 249–639 | 39.0% | 9.1 | 14.9 |
| 2P | 187–427 | 43.8% | 6.1 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 62–212 | 29.2% | 3.0 | 4.9 |
| FT | 288–386 | 74.6% | 5.5 | 9.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.8% | 52.4% | 33.2% | 60.4% | 0.73 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Troy Harper | Campbell | 20 | 17:10 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 16.7 | 38.2% | 60.0% | 49.4% |
| 2016 Troy Harper | Campbell | 9Few games | 25:53 | 13.3 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 20.6 | 31.8%† | 73.9% | 51.6%† |
| 2018 Troy Harper | Drexel | 17 | 22:56 | 10.5 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 18.3 | 12.9%† | 80.4% | 53.5% |
| 2019 Troy Harper | Drexel | 24 | 31:23 | 17.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 21.6 | 28.0% | 77.5% | 53.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -3.0 | -4.3 to -1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -3.4 | Not computed for this season | 2,551 | ||
| 2018 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | -3.0 | -4.6 to -1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -3.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,358 | ||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2015 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2015, 2016. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology