Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Luka Kamber

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

755:50 minutes logged

Games logged
47
Minutes per game
16:05
Points per game
4.0
Rebounds / assists per game
2.0 / 0.7
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game4.02.00.70.40.10.91.9
Per 40 minutes10.15.01.91.00.22.24.8
Season totals19094351834290
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG62–18733.2%4.09.9
2P15–4037.5%†0.92.1
3P47–14732.0%3.17.8
FT19–2770.4%0.61.4
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
45.7%47.8%78.6%14.4%0.83

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2014 Luka KamberLouisiana 3Few games1:510.70.30.014.40.0%†—50.0%†
2015 Luka KamberNicholls St 1719:076.52.31.013.740.6%61.1%†55.5%†
2016 Luka KamberNicholls St 2217:213.42.00.77.925.3%88.9%†41.2%†
2017 Luka KamberNicholls St 5Few games8:450.42.00.41.80.0%†—16.7%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2017Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2016Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2015Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2014Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology