Zac Tillman
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1027:46 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 68
- Minutes per game
- 15:07
- Points per game
- 4.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.5 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.9 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 6.8 |
| Season totals | 307 | 176 | 22 | 21 | 19 | 51 | 176 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 119–240 | 49.6% | 3.5 | 9.3 |
| 2P | 119–240 | 49.6% | 3.5 | 9.3 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 69–110 | 62.7% | 1.6 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.6% | 53.2% | 0.0% | 45.8% | 0.43 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Zac Tillman | Monmouth NJ | 20 | 16:31 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 9.2 | — | 45.2% | 44.4%† |
| 2015 Zac Tillman | Monmouth NJ | 26 | 15:23 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 10.3 | — | 55.9% | 53.7%† |
| 2016 Zac Tillman | Monmouth NJ | 8Few games | 7:55 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 17.1 | — | 87.5%† | 55.1%† |
| 2018 Zac Tillman | Monmouth NJ | 14 | 16:43 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 17.3 | — | 78.4% | 61.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Monmouth NJ | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | +0.1 | -0.9 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.1 | Not computed for this season | 739 | ||
| 2016 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2015 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2014 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | training: in model fit | A point value exists for this season but no range is published, so none is shown. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown; this identity has such a value in 2014, 2015. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology