Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Dean Danos

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

544:33 minutes logged

Games logged
50
Minutes per game
10:53
Points per game
2.5
Rebounds / assists per game
1.1 / 0.9
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game2.51.10.90.20.00.71.3
Per 40 minutes9.33.93.40.70.02.54.7
Season totals12653461003464
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG41–9045.6%†1.86.6
2P18–4045.0%†0.82.9
3P23–5046.0%1.03.7
FT21–2875.0%0.62.1
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.3%†61.6%†55.6%†31.1%†1.35

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2014 Dean DanosN Kentucky 2011:442.91.20.99.752.9%†100.0%†65.1%†
2015 Dean DanosN Kentucky 15Under 100 minutes5:550.90.20.36.316.7%†100.0%†37.6%†
2016 Dean DanosN Kentucky 1514:443.71.71.510.057.1%†61.1%†68.9%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2016Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2015Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2014Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology