Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Dante Williams

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2065:42 minutes logged

Games logged
96
Minutes per game
21:31
Points per game
5.7
Rebounds / assists per game
2.5 / 1.0
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game5.72.51.00.60.30.82.3
Per 40 minutes10.64.61.81.00.51.44.3
Season totals54823992532572223
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG200–47242.4%4.99.1
2P107–20452.5%2.14.0
3P93–26834.7%2.85.2
FT55–8068.8%0.81.5
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
52.2%54.0%56.8%16.9%1.28

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2012 Dante WilliamsOakland 2710:191.41.80.35.318.8%†50.0%†39.6%†
2013 Dante WilliamsOakland 1914:463.01.60.48.128.6%†42.9%†49.1%†
2014 Dante WilliamsOakland 2424:067.83.71.312.938.9%68.3%59.2%
2015 Dante WilliamsOakland 2635:4210.32.71.811.535.5%78.6%54.6%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2015Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2014Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2013Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2012Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology