Cody Henegar

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

133:34 minutes logged

Games logged: 19
Minutes per game: 7:02
Points per game: 2.3
Rebounds / assists per game: 1.8 / 0.0

Box line on three bases
Basis	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF
Per game	2.3	1.8	0.0	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.5
Per 40 minutes	13.2	10.2	0.0	0.6	1.2	2.1	2.7
Season totals	44	34	0	2	4	7	9

Shooting with attempts
Shot	Made–att.	Pct	Att/G	Att/40
FG	16–47	34.0%†	2.5	14.1
2P	11–34	32.4%†	1.8	10.2
3P	5–13	38.5%†	0.7	3.9
FT	7–12	58.3%†	0.6	3.6

Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%	Estimated TS%	3PA / FGA	FTA / FGA	AST / TO
39.4%†	42.1%†	27.7%†	25.5%†	0.00

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
Season	Team	G	MPG	Pts	Reb	Ast	Pts/40	3P%	FT%	TS%
2011 Cody Henegar	UNC Greensboro	19	7:02	2.3	1.8	0.0	13.2	38.5%†	58.3%†	42.1%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
Season	Team	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range	Split role	Value
2011	Not applicable	training: in model fit	No model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology