Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Dante Holmes

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

1621:42 minutes logged

Games logged
68
Minutes per game
23:51
Points per game
9.6
Rebounds / assists per game
3.4 / 1.2
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game9.63.41.20.80.11.93.0
Per 40 minutes16.25.72.11.40.13.15.1
Season totals65523184575127205
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG239–53544.7%7.913.2
2P158–31250.6%4.67.7
3P81–22336.3%3.35.5
FT96–15561.9%2.33.8
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
52.2%54.3%41.7%29.0%0.66

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2012 Dante HolmesFGCU 2421:168.82.30.716.627.5%†66.1%54.6%
2014 Dante HolmesNC Central 129:313.81.60.315.838.5%†75.0%†58.4%†
2015 Dante HolmesNC Central 1928:569.65.32.213.332.1%53.1%48.5%
2016 Dante HolmesNC Central 1334:2516.54.51.819.243.5%63.9%59.1%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2016Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2015Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2014Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2012Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology