Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

John Peterson

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

430:18 minutes logged

Games logged
31
Minutes per game
13:53
Points per game
4.2
Rebounds / assists per game
2.0 / 0.5
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game4.22.00.50.20.00.81.5
Per 40 minutes12.25.81.40.70.02.24.5
Season totals1316215702448
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG42–9444.7%†3.08.7
2P25–4358.1%†1.44.0
3P17–5133.3%1.64.7
FT30–4271.4%1.43.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
53.7%†58.2%†54.3%†44.7%†0.63

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2009 John PetersonSamford 8Few games3:230.10.30.01.50.0%†25.0%†6.4%†
2011 John PetersonSamford 1916:035.22.60.612.942.4%†78.8%66.6%†
2012 John PetersonSamford 4Few games24:368.02.80.813.021.4%†60.0%†51.3%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2012Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2011Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology