Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Mike Rose

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

3553:00 minutes logged

Games logged
112
Minutes per game
31:43
Points per game
13.9
Rebounds / assists per game
3.9 / 1.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game13.93.91.81.50.12.01.3
Per 40 minutes17.55.02.21.80.22.51.6
Season totals155244219916314222141
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG532–122243.5%10.913.8
2P291–60947.8%5.46.9
3P241–61339.3%5.56.9
FT247–32476.2%2.93.6
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
53.4%56.9%50.2%26.5%0.90

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2006 Mike RoseE Kentucky 2820:026.02.80.612.030.8%65.7%52.4%
2007 Mike RoseE Kentucky 2933:0615.23.71.818.339.3%76.1%58.2%
2008 Mike RoseE Kentucky 2736:4914.94.52.216.233.5%81.3%52.1%
2009 Mike RoseE Kentucky 2837:0419.34.92.520.848.1%76.2%61.6%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2007Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology