Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Daniel Faris

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2167:00 minutes logged

Games logged
114
Minutes per game
19:01
Points per game
7.5
Rebounds / assists per game
4.2 / 0.6
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game7.54.20.60.50.81.12.6
Per 40 minutes15.88.81.41.01.72.45.5
Season totals857475745594131299
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG319–63150.6%5.511.6
2P318–62051.3%5.411.4
3P1–119.1%†0.10.2
FT218–33664.9%2.96.2
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
50.6%55.0%1.7%53.2%0.56

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2006 Daniel FarisNew Mexico 214:540.50.80.23.90.0%†100.0%†36.3%†
2007 Daniel FarisNew Mexico 2915:215.03.50.813.114.3%†60.7%53.0%
2008 Daniel FarisNew Mexico 3124:279.84.70.816.00.0%†54.6%53.2%
2009 Daniel FarisNew Mexico 3326:0512.16.40.718.5—72.4%58.1%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2007Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology