Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Jeremy Pargo

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

3309:00 minutes logged

Games logged
114
Minutes per game
29:02
Points per game
9.4
Rebounds / assists per game
3.4 / 4.4
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game9.43.44.41.20.12.61.9
Per 40 minutes12.94.76.11.70.23.72.6
Season totals107038550313916302212
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG393–85446.0%7.510.3
2P330–64451.2%5.67.8
3P63–21030.0%1.82.5
FT221–31470.4%2.83.8
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
49.7%53.9%24.6%36.8%1.67

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2006 Jeremy PargoGonzaga 2917:463.02.22.06.723.5%†68.8%38.0%†
2007 Jeremy PargoGonzaga 2434:5011.74.14.913.430.2%†74.0%55.2%
2008 Jeremy PargoGonzaga 2834:3213.04.06.115.027.8%67.6%57.9%
2009 Jeremy PargoGonzaga 3330:0210.33.44.813.836.1%70.0%54.7%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2007Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology