Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Drew Speraw

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

109:00 minutes logged

Games logged
40
Minutes per game
2:44
Points per game
0.7
Rebounds / assists per game
0.1 / 0.1
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game0.70.10.10.10.00.30.3
Per 40 minutes10.61.81.51.50.03.74.8
Season totals2954401013
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG10–2441.7%†0.68.8
2P5–1050.0%†0.33.7
3P5–1435.7%†0.35.1
FT4–1040.0%†0.33.7
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
52.1%†51.1%†58.3%†41.7%†0.40

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2006 Drew SperawUCF 14Under 100 minutes1:210.00.10.10.00.0%†0.0%†0.0%†
2008 Drew SperawUCF 9Few games2:400.90.10.213.320.0%†75.0%†51.5%†
2009 Drew SperawUCF 17Under 100 minutes3:531.20.10.012.757.1%†25.0%†66.6%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology