Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Zam Fredrick

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2923:00 minutes logged

Games logged
102
Minutes per game
28:39
Points per game
12.1
Rebounds / assists per game
2.4 / 2.7
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game12.12.42.70.80.12.42.2
Per 40 minutes16.93.43.71.10.13.43.0
Season totals12342452747810249221
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG443–112139.5%11.015.3
2P286–67542.4%6.69.2
3P157–44635.2%4.46.1
FT191–27569.5%2.73.8
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
46.5%49.7%39.8%24.5%1.10

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2005 Zam FredrickGeorgia Tech 156:521.90.70.910.933.3%†50.0%†40.4%†
2006 Zam FredrickGeorgia Tech 2629:0710.62.64.114.530.5%75.4%47.9%
2008 Zam FredrickSouth Carolina 3135:2914.92.93.216.834.7%67.1%49.9%
2009 Zam FredrickSouth Carolina 3032:0615.72.61.919.538.4%69.0%51.3%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2009Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2005Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology