Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Zach Everingham

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

1751:00 minutes logged

Games logged
108
Minutes per game
16:13
Points per game
3.7
Rebounds / assists per game
2.0 / 1.4
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game3.72.01.40.50.10.71.6
Per 40 minutes9.24.83.51.30.21.74.0
Season totals40321115458974173
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG135–36137.4%3.38.2
2P58–11650.0%1.12.6
3P77–24531.4%2.35.6
FT56–7080.0%0.61.6
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
48.1%51.4%67.9%19.4%2.08

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2005 Zach EveringhamDetroit 259:552.41.10.59.533.3%100.0%†49.7%†
2006 Zach EveringhamDetroit 2812:092.81.00.99.123.6%83.3%†43.1%†
2007 Zach EveringhamDetroit 2818:154.82.61.910.430.6%73.3%55.8%
2008 Zach EveringhamDetroit 2724:095.03.12.38.236.5%84.0%54.0%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2008Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2007Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2006Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.
2005Not applicabletraining: in model fitNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology