Chadlyn Traylor
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
526:15 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 16:59
- Points per game
- 3.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.1 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.8 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.0 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 119 | 33 | 63 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 42–99 | 42.4%† | 3.2 | 7.5 |
| 2P | 25–58 | 43.1%† | 1.9 | 4.4 |
| 3P | 17–41 | 41.5%† | 1.3 | 3.1 |
| FT | 18–32 | 56.3% | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.0%† | 52.6%† | 41.4%† | 32.3%† | 4.20 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Chadlyn Traylor | Col. of Charleston | 31 | 16:59 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 41.5%† | 56.3% | 52.6%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Col Charleston · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $19K
- 80% range $5K to $61K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.0%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $99K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $17K to $26K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 41.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Col Charleston: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Col Charleston | $19Kspeculative | $5K to $61K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.2 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.6 | +3.1range +2.7 to +3.5 | 1,768 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology