Curtis Stinson Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
232:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 8:01
- Points per game
- 1.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 0.9 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 5.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 33 | 25 | 19 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 12–45 | 26.7%† | 1.6 | 7.7 |
| 2P | 12–39 | 30.8%† | 1.3 | 6.7 |
| 3P | 0–6 | 0.0%† | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| FT | 9–10 | 90.0%† | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.7%† | 33.4%† | 13.3%† | 22.2%† | 1.46 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Curtis Stinson Jr. | North Texas | 29 | 8:01 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 5.7 | 0.0%† | 90.0%† | 33.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Texas · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $19K
- 80% range $5K to $54K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.5%
- team pool $900K, 80% range $395K to $2.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $16K to $20K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 19.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Texas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Texas | $19Kspeculative | $5K to $54K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -1.7 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | +0.9 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.2 | 773 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology