Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Ja'Quavis Williford

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

111:47 minutes logged

Games logged
20
Minutes per game
5:35
Points per game
2.3
Rebounds / assists per game
0.6 / 0.1
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game2.30.60.10.10.10.10.1
Per 40 minutes16.14.30.40.40.41.10.7
Season totals451211132
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG15–4930.6%†2.517.5
2P8–1942.1%†0.96.8
3P7–3023.3%†1.510.7
FT8–988.9%†0.53.2
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
37.8%†42.5%†61.2%†18.4%†0.33

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2025 Ja'Quavis WillifordOregon St 9Few games5:222.30.30.117.436.4%†100.0%†54.7%†
2026 Ja'Quavis WillifordOregon St. 11Under 100 minutes5:462.20.80.015.115.8%†75.0%†35.5%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Oregon St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$8K
80% range $3K to $19K
Median share of team pool
0.7%
team pool $1.15M, 80% range $490K to $2.55M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$6K to $8K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$8K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
5.1%
Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Oregon St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.
2025Not applicableevaluation: examined, post hocNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology