Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Ryan Lopez

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

13:46 minutes logged Under 100 minutes

Games logged
12
Minutes per game
1:09
Points per game
0.5
Rebounds / assists per game
0.3 / 0.1
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game0.50.30.10.10.00.00.3
Per 40 minutes17.48.72.92.90.00.08.7
Season totals6311003
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG2–450.0%†0.311.6
2P0–0—0.00.0
3P2–450.0%†0.311.6
FT0–0—0.00.0
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
75.0%†75.0%†100.0%†0.0%†—

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2024 Ryan LopezChattanooga 4Few games1:360.80.00.318.750.0%†—75.0%†
2025 Ryan LopezChattanooga 4Few games0:250.80.00.072.7100.0%†—150.0%†
2026 Ryan LopezChattanooga 4Few games1:250.00.80.00.00.0%†—0.0%†

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Chattanooga · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$2K
80% range $1K to $4K
Median share of team pool
0.7%
team pool $240K, 80% range $91K to $645K
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$1K to $2K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$2K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
0.5%
Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Chattanooga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

No model-implied value is published for this player: fewer than 300 on-court possessions in every season, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.

Seasons played, with no model-implied value published
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleValue
2026Not applicabledescriptive: not used in fit or gatesNo model-implied value is published.
2025Not applicableevaluation: examined, post hocNo model-implied value is published.
2024Not applicableevaluation: examined, post hocNo model-implied value is published.

NIL methodology