Marcus Rigsby Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1413:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 83
- Minutes per game
- 17:02
- Points per game
- 5.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.9 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 420 | 172 | 78 | 49 | 24 | 98 | 130 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 146–391 | 37.3% | 4.7 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 70–146 | 47.9% | 1.8 | 4.1 |
| 3P | 76–245 | 31.0% | 3.0 | 6.9 |
| FT | 52–79 | 65.8% | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1% | 49.3% | 62.7% | 20.2% | 0.80 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Marcus Rigsby Jr. | Troy | 25 | 11:15 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 13.2 | 34.6% | 62.5%† | 49.7%† |
| 2025 Marcus Rigsby Jr. | Troy | 29 | 21:28 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 12.4 | 29.1% | 65.1% | 46.9% |
| 2026 Marcus Rigsby Jr. | UT Arlington | 29 | 17:35 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 31.8% | 67.9% | 53.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UT Arlington · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $5K
- 80% range $1K to $23K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.8%
- team pool $220K, 80% range $82K to $590K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $5K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 40.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UT Arlington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UT Arlington | $5Kspeculative | $1K to $23K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.9 | -3.0 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -2.0 | +0.0 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5 | 1,545 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.3 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.1 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.8 | 2,048 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -1.8 to +0.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.6 | +0.8range +0.7 to +1.0 | 916 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology