Teddy Washington, Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1453:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 53
- Minutes per game
- 27:26
- Points per game
- 11.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.5 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.7 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 608 | 224 | 95 | 85 | 13 | 77 | 118 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 215–538 | 40.0% | 10.2 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 148–291 | 50.9% | 5.5 | 8.0 |
| 3P | 67–247 | 27.1% | 4.7 | 6.8 |
| FT | 111–145 | 76.6% | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.2% | 50.5% | 45.9% | 27.0% | 1.23 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Teddy Washington, Jr. | SE Missouri St | 25 | 33:07 | 14.2 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 17.1 | 30.2% | 75.7% | 50.0% |
| 2026 Teddy Washington, Jr. | Chattanooga | 28 | 22:21 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 16.2 | 21.2% | 77.3% | 51.2% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Chattanooga · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $11K
- 80% range $1K to $48K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.9%
- team pool $240K, 80% range $91K to $645K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $11K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 53.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Chattanooga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Chattanooga | $11Kspeculative | $1K to $48K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.6 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -0.2 | +2.7range +2.2 to +3.1 | 2,020 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | SE Missouri St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.7 | +0.4 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +1.5 | +5.0range +4.3 to +5.9 | 2,806 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology