Bryce Ford
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1333:33 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 73
- Minutes per game
- 18:16
- Points per game
- 5.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.7 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.4 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 415 | 133 | 55 | 23 | 7 | 40 | 104 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 137–347 | 39.5% | 4.8 | 10.4 |
| 2P | 66–144 | 45.8% | 2.0 | 4.3 |
| 3P | 71–203 | 35.0% | 2.8 | 6.1 |
| FT | 70–81 | 86.4% | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.7% | 54.2% | 58.5% | 23.3% | 1.38 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Bryce Ford | Toledo | 21 | 8:25 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 14.7 | 47.8%† | 100.0%† | 68.7%† |
| 2025 Bryce Ford | Toledo | 26 | 21:42 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 11.9 | 36.3% | 85.3% | 53.2% |
| 2026 Bryce Ford | Arizona St. | 26 | 22:48 | 7.0 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 12.3 | 31.0% | 82.9% | 51.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Arizona St · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $165K
- 80% range $26K to $320K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $165K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $28K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Arizona St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Arizona St | $165Kspeculative | $26K to $320K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -2.0 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.6 | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.6 | 1,972 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Toledo | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.8 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.6 | +2.3range +1.8 to +2.7 | 1,996 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Toledo | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.8 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -1.0 | +0.8range +0.6 to +0.9 | 632 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology