Conrad Martinez
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
879:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 71
- Minutes per game
- 12:23
- Points per game
- 4.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 0.7 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.7 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.1 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 333 | 53 | 128 | 58 | 1 | 45 | 63 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 106–235 | 45.1% | 3.3 | 10.7 |
| 2P | 66–110 | 60.0% | 1.5 | 5.0 |
| 3P | 40–125 | 32.0% | 1.8 | 5.7 |
| FT | 81–97 | 83.5% | 1.4 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.6% | 60.0% | 53.2% | 41.3% | 2.84 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Conrad Martinez | Arizona | 18Under 100 minutes | 3:19 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 0.0%† | 66.7%† | 45.7%† |
| 2025 Conrad Martinez | Arizona | 20Under 100 minutes | 4:50 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 14.9 | 55.6%† | 87.5%† | 92.2%† |
| 2026 Conrad Martinez | High Point | 33 | 21:55 | 8.6 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 15.7 | 31.5% | 83.7% | 58.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
High Point · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $9K to $78K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.2%
- team pool $290K, 80% range $110K to $750K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $31K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
High Point: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | High Point | $28Kspeculative | $9K to $78K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.9 | +1.0 to +4.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.6 | +0.2 | +3.3range +2.7 to +3.9 | 2,344 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Arizona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.3 | +2.9 to +5.8 | Limited evidence | +4.1 | +0.2 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.6 | 351 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology