KJ Lewis
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2352:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 97
- Minutes per game
- 24:15
- Points per game
- 10.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.3 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.0 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 4.3 |
| Season totals | 999 | 399 | 235 | 137 | 57 | 157 | 252 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 333–781 | 42.6% | 8.1 | 13.3 |
| 2P | 276–570 | 48.4% | 5.9 | 9.7 |
| 3P | 57–211 | 27.0% | 2.2 | 3.6 |
| FT | 276–354 | 78.0% | 3.6 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.3% | 53.3% | 27.0% | 45.3% | 1.50 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 KJ Lewis | Arizona | 35 | 18:42 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 13.0 | 32.5%† | 78.9% | 56.6% |
| 2025 KJ Lewis | Arizona | 35 | 25:58 | 11.0 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 17.0 | 19.1% | 79.6% | 52.8% |
| 2026 KJ Lewis | Georgetown | 27 | 29:15 | 14.8 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 20.3 | 30.1% | 75.9% | 52.2% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgetown · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $535K
- 80% range $265K to $1.10M
- Median share of team pool
- 13.9%
- team pool $3.65M, 80% range $2.05M to $6.35M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $530K to $545K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgetown: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgetown | $535Kspeculative | $265K to $1.10M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.1 | +1.1 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.7 | +4.6range +4.2 to +5.1 | 2,401 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Arizona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.3 | +0.9 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.8 | +4.4range +3.6 to +5.3 | 3,228 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Arizona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.0 | +1.9 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +1.3 | +2.3range +2.0 to +2.7 | 2,394 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology