Naithan George
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2867:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 88
- Minutes per game
- 32:35
- Points per game
- 10.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 5.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.8 | 3.3 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.2 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 947 | 292 | 486 | 91 | 26 | 243 | 157 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 323–808 | 40.0% | 9.2 | 11.3 |
| 2P | 211–444 | 47.5% | 5.0 | 6.2 |
| 3P | 112–364 | 30.8% | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| FT | 189–244 | 77.5% | 2.8 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.9% | 51.7% | 45.0% | 30.2% | 2.00 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Naithan George | Georgia Tech | 25 | 29:28 | 9.2 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 12.5 | 30.6% | 67.6% | 51.1% |
| 2025 Naithan George | Georgia Tech | 31 | 35:42 | 11.9 | 4.4 | 6.3 | 13.3 | 32.1% | 77.9% | 50.0% |
| 2026 Naithan George | Syracuse | 32 | 31:59 | 10.9 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 13.6 | 29.3% | 83.3% | 54.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Syracuse · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $750K
- 80% range $470K to $1.30M
- Median share of team pool
- 20.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $750K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Syracuse: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Syracuse | $750Kspeculative | $470K to $1.30M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.6 | +1.5 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +0.3 | +5.6range +5.0 to +6.2 | 3,293 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Georgia Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | +0.3 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.9 | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.0 | 3,637 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Georgia Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.1 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.1 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.1 | 2,419 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology