Emil Skytta
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1486:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 75
- Minutes per game
- 19:49
- Points per game
- 5.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.3 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 381 | 153 | 122 | 47 | 6 | 118 | 170 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 154–332 | 46.4% | 4.4 | 8.9 |
| 2P | 127–236 | 53.8% | 3.1 | 6.4 |
| 3P | 27–96 | 28.1% | 1.3 | 2.6 |
| FT | 46–86 | 53.5% | 1.1 | 2.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 51.5% | 28.9% | 25.9% | 1.03 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Emil Skytta | CS Sacramento | 31 | 20:03 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 9.4 | 28.2%† | 63.9% | 48.4% |
| 2025 Emil Skytta | CS Sacramento | 20 | 29:07 | 7.7 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 10.5 | 28.0% | 50.0% | 52.8% |
| 2026 Emil Skytta | North Dakota St. | 24 | 11:46 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 11.6 | 28.6%† | 37.5%† | 55.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
N Dakota St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $2K to $23K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.4%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $100K to $705K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $9K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 19.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
N Dakota St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N Dakota St | $8Kspeculative | $2K to $23K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.2 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.6 | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.4 | 756 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | CS Sacramento | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.8 | -4.3 to -1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -2.0 | -0.8 | +1.2range +0.8 to +1.7 | 1,953 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | CS Sacramento | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.9 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.5 | +1.7range +1.3 to +2.1 | 1,969 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology