Cruz Davis
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2618:19 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 85
- Minutes per game
- 30:48
- Points per game
- 13.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 3.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.9 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.0 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 1181 | 258 | 296 | 94 | 26 | 174 | 195 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 404–970 | 41.6% | 11.4 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 270–616 | 43.8% | 7.2 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 134–354 | 37.9% | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| FT | 239–303 | 78.9% | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.6% | 53.5% | 36.5% | 31.2% | 1.70 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Cruz Davis | Iona | 22 | 18:32 | 6.7 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 14.5 | 33.3%† | 76.3% | 51.1% |
| 2024 Cruz Davis | St John's | 4Few games | 6:20 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 11.1 | 0.0%† | 100.0%† | 30.9%† |
| 2025 Cruz Davis | Hofstra | 26 | 36:00 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 15.5 | 35.8% | 71.1% | 50.9% |
| 2026 Cruz Davis | Hofstra | 33 | 37:51 | 20.1 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 21.2 | 40.3% | 83.6% | 56.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Hofstra · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $50K
- 80% range $17K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.5%
- team pool $280K, 80% range $105K to $740K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $47K to $56K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 96.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Hofstra: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hofstra | $50Kspeculative | $17K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.1 | +1.2 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +0.4 | +8.7range +7.8 to +9.7 | 3,936 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Hofstra | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -0.9 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.9 | +4.6range +3.6 to +5.5 | 3,045 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | Iona | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.9 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | -0.3 | +1.1range +0.8 to +1.3 | 1,410 | Season detail | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology