Ridvan Tutic
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1296:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 70
- Minutes per game
- 18:31
- Points per game
- 4.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.1 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.7 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.1 | 11.0 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 327 | 358 | 47 | 12 | 28 | 59 | 103 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 132–237 | 55.7% | 3.4 | 7.3 |
| 2P | 132–237 | 55.7% | 3.4 | 7.3 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 63–107 | 58.9% | 1.5 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.7% | 57.6% | 0.0% | 45.1% | 0.80 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Ridvan Tutic | New Hampshire | 24 | 19:52 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 7.6 | — | 58.3% | 53.0%† |
| 2025 Ridvan Tutic | Maine | 18 | 9:10 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 10.4 | — | 71.4%† | 62.8%† |
| 2026 Ridvan Tutic | Stonehill | 28 | 23:23 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 1.0 | 11.8 | — | 54.0% | 58.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stonehill · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stonehill: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stonehill | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.2 | -0.2 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | +2.6 | +3.8range +3.3 to +4.3 | 1,916 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Maine | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.4 to -0.5 | Limited evidence | -0.5 | -0.9 | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.8 | 555 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | New Hampshire | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.5 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.8 | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.6 | 1,604 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology