Rex Sunderland
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1555:11 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 73
- Minutes per game
- 21:18
- Points per game
- 3.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.5 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.6 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 6.7 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 261 | 181 | 148 | 66 | 21 | 111 | 147 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 96–292 | 32.9% | 4.0 | 7.5 |
| 2P | 56–138 | 40.6% | 1.9 | 3.5 |
| 3P | 40–154 | 26.0% | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| FT | 29–48 | 60.4% | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.7% | 41.7% | 52.7% | 16.4% | 1.33 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rex Sunderland | New Hampshire | 12Under 100 minutes | 5:01 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 6.7 | 40.0%† | — | 41.7%† |
| 2024 Rex Sunderland | New Hampshire | 25 | 21:09 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 22.2% | 66.7%† | 44.2%† |
| 2025 Rex Sunderland | New Hampshire | 5Few games | 23:10 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 8.6 | 28.6%† | 33.3%† | 39.9%† |
| 2026 Rex Sunderland | Stonehill | 31 | 27:26 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 7.0 | 27.2% | 60.6% | 40.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stonehill · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stonehill: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stonehill | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -1.7 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -2.0 | +1.5 | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.6 | 2,413 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | New Hampshire | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.5 to -0.7 | Limited evidence | -0.7 | -0.9 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 387 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | New Hampshire | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.7 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | -0.2 | +1.6range +1.1 to +2.1 | 1,895 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology