Tre Dinkins
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2672:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 105
- Minutes per game
- 25:27
- Points per game
- 10.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 2.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.4 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.4 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 1094 | 223 | 265 | 67 | 17 | 169 | 141 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 361–920 | 39.2% | 8.8 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 137–329 | 41.6% | 3.1 | 4.9 |
| 3P | 224–591 | 37.9% | 5.6 | 8.8 |
| FT | 148–185 | 80.0% | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.4% | 54.6% | 64.2% | 20.1% | 1.57 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Tre Dinkins | Canisius | 25 | 20:48 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 11.8 | 34.9% | 76.5%† | 46.2% |
| 2024 Tre Dinkins | Canisius | 16 | 35:23 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 17.4 | 38.5% | 82.0% | 55.7% |
| 2025 Tre Dinkins | Duquesne | 30 | 29:21 | 13.4 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 18.2 | 38.7% | 80.0% | 56.3% |
| 2026 Tre Dinkins | George Washington | 34 | 20:46 | 8.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 16.7 | 38.1% | 79.1% | 56.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
G Washington · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $64K
- 80% range $19K to $160K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.6%
- team pool $830K, 80% range $360K to $1.85M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $62K to $67K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 50.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
G Washington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | G Washington | $64Kspeculative | $19K to $160K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.0 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | -0.8 | +3.9range +3.3 to +4.3 | 2,349 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Duquesne | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.5 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.6 | +4.1range +3.4 to +4.7 | 2,928 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Canisius | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.5 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -0.5 | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.2 | 1,833 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Canisius | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.1 | -4.1 to -2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -2.4 | +1.1range +0.7 to +1.6 | 1,731 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology