Xaivian Lee
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2889:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 110
- Minutes per game
- 26:16
- Points per game
- 12.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 3.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.6 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.2 | 6.6 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 1388 | 476 | 399 | 107 | 27 | 167 | 211 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 487–1107 | 44.0% | 10.1 | 15.3 |
| 2P | 317–593 | 53.5% | 5.4 | 8.2 |
| 3P | 170–514 | 33.1% | 4.7 | 7.1 |
| FT | 244–314 | 77.7% | 2.9 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.7% | 55.7% | 46.4% | 28.4% | 2.39 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Xaivian Lee | Princeton | 27 | 12:40 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 14.0 | 26.7%† | 73.7% | 51.8%† |
| 2024 Xaivian Lee | Princeton | 23 | 32:52 | 18.6 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 22.6 | 35.6% | 78.8% | 58.1% |
| 2025 Xaivian Lee | Princeton | 25 | 33:20 | 17.4 | 6.5 | 5.3 | 20.9 | 38.0% | 79.3% | 56.3% |
| 2026 Xaivian Lee | Florida | 35 | 27:23 | 11.6 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 16.9 | 29.2% | 76.5% | 54.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $445K
- 80% range $285K to $660K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.7%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $445K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 68.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida | $445Kspeculative | $285K to $660K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.7 | +3.3 to +6.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | +2.8 | +6.1range +5.3 to +6.8 | 3,171 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.9 | +1.9 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | +1.0 | +5.2range +4.6 to +5.9 | 2,844 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.1 | +2.2 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | -0.0 | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.9 | 2,387 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.3 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.5 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6 | 1,183 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology