Mohamed Wague
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1705:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 123
- Minutes per game
- 13:52
- Points per game
- 4.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.7 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.5 | 11.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 7.2 |
| Season totals | 575 | 501 | 91 | 83 | 95 | 114 | 307 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 205–311 | 65.9% | 2.5 | 7.3 |
| 2P | 203–304 | 66.8% | 2.5 | 7.1 |
| 3P | 2–7 | 28.6%† | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| FT | 163–253 | 64.4% | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.2% | 68.1% | 2.3% | 81.4% | 0.80 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Mohamed Wague | West Virginia | 27 | 10:31 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 15.2 | — | 48.8% | 70.1%† |
| 2024 Mohamed Wague | Alabama | 31 | 8:13 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 15.1 | 50.0%† | 75.8% | 71.1%† |
| 2025 Mohamed Wague | Oklahoma | 28 | 11:55 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 14.0 | — | 64.7% | 71.8%† |
| 2026 Mohamed Wague | Oklahoma | 37 | 22:30 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 12.2 | 20.0%† | 66.4% | 64.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oklahoma · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $670K
- 80% range $410K to $1.35M
- Median share of team pool
- 18.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $670K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 56.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oklahoma: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oklahoma | $670Kspeculative | $410K to $1.35M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.6 | +3.2 to +5.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +3.3 | +5.9range +5.2 to +6.3 | 2,644 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.4 | +2.4 to +4.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +2.1 | +1.9range +1.7 to +2.1 | 1,180 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.3 | +2.1 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.8 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.5 | 988 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | West Virginia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.7 | +1.5 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +1.3 | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.8 | 978 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology