Quion Williams
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3080:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 116
- Minutes per game
- 26:33
- Points per game
- 10.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.1 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.1 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.3 | 7.6 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 1175 | 589 | 299 | 117 | 55 | 247 | 225 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 428–986 | 43.4% | 8.5 | 12.8 |
| 2P | 368–772 | 47.7% | 6.7 | 10.0 |
| 3P | 60–214 | 28.0% | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| FT | 259–358 | 72.3% | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.5% | 51.4% | 21.7% | 36.3% | 1.21 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Quion Williams | Oklahoma St | 30 | 12:02 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 9.1 | 20.5%† | 75.0%† | 39.8%† |
| 2024 Quion Williams | Oklahoma St | 28 | 28:09 | 7.4 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 10.6 | 21.1%† | 70.2% | 51.2% |
| 2025 Quion Williams | Abilene Chr | 28 | 30:05 | 13.4 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 17.8 | 34.0% | 70.3% | 52.1% |
| 2026 Quion Williams | Ark.-Pine Bluff | 30 | 36:18 | 17.0 | 7.7 | 4.9 | 18.8 | 31.0% | 74.1% | 53.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Ark Pine Bluff · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $20K
- 80% range $1K to $67K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.7%
- team pool $140K, 80% range $51K to $380K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $21K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 91.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Ark Pine Bluff: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Ark Pine Bluff | $20Kspeculative | $1K to $67K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -1.4 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.7 | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.6 | 3,664 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Abilene Chr | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.9 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.2 | +2.9range +2.4 to +3.5 | 2,994 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oklahoma St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.5 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.4 | +2.3range +1.8 to +2.9 | 2,722 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Oklahoma St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.8 | -4.0 to -1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -2.1 | +0.7range +0.4 to +1.0 | 1,085 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology