Eli King
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1904:10 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 72
- Minutes per game
- 26:27
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.1 | 6.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 672 | 310 | 126 | 100 | 39 | 63 | 182 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 242–563 | 43.0% | 7.8 | 11.8 |
| 2P | 158–316 | 50.0% | 4.4 | 6.6 |
| 3P | 84–247 | 34.0% | 3.4 | 5.2 |
| FT | 104–155 | 67.1% | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.4% | 53.2% | 43.9% | 27.5% | 2.00 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Eli King | Iowa St | 8Few games | 2:49 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 20.0%† | 66.7%† | 46.7%† |
| 2024 Eli King | North Dakota | 22 | 23:32 | 7.1 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 12.1 | 35.0% | 56.7% | 52.3% |
| 2025 Eli King | North Dakota | 10 | 31:03 | 10.4 | 4.9 | 2.5 | 13.4 | 45.9%† | 60.0%† | 61.5%† |
| 2026 Eli King | North Dakota | 32 | 32:55 | 12.6 | 5.4 | 1.9 | 15.3 | 31.0% | 71.2% | 52.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Dakota · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $86K
- 80% range $27K to $275K
- Median share of team pool
- 28.2%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $100K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $75K to $89K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 85.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Dakota: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Dakota | $86Kspeculative | $27K to $275K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.5 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.3 | +5.3range +4.8 to +5.8 | 2,826 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | North Dakota | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.4 | +0.6 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | -0.2 | +3.6range +3.3 to +4.0 | 824 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | North Dakota | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -2.0 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.8 | +2.1range +1.6 to +2.8 | 1,600 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology