Luke Hunger
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1221:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 84
- Minutes per game
- 14:33
- Points per game
- 5.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.2 | 8.2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 5.1 |
| Season totals | 433 | 251 | 70 | 10 | 12 | 73 | 156 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 159–335 | 47.5% | 4.0 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 137–247 | 55.5% | 2.9 | 8.1 |
| 3P | 22–88 | 25.0% | 1.0 | 2.9 |
| FT | 93–124 | 75.0% | 1.5 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.7% | 55.6% | 26.3% | 37.0% | 0.96 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Luke Hunger | Northwestern | 3Few games | 7:13 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 18.5 | 0.0%† | 66.7%† | 53.6%† |
| 2024 Luke Hunger | Northwestern | 27 | 11:56 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 12.4 | 24.0%† | 64.3% | 56.0%† |
| 2025 Luke Hunger | Northwestern | 22 | 11:59 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 9.0 | 11.8%† | 25.0%† | 41.7%† |
| 2026 Luke Hunger | George Washington | 32 | 19:12 | 8.3 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 17.2 | 31.1%† | 80.9% | 60.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
G Washington · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $57K
- 80% range $19K to $140K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.7%
- team pool $830K, 80% range $360K to $1.85M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $56K to $59K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 44.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
G Washington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | G Washington | $57Kspeculative | $19K to $140K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.3 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.7 | +3.4range +2.9 to +3.8 | 2,077 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Northwestern | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.2 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +0.2 | +1.0range +0.9 to +1.3 | 882 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Northwestern | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.1 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.5 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 1,065 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology