Elijah Crawford
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
625:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 37
- Minutes per game
- 16:54
- Points per game
- 8.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.9 / 3.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.6 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.3 | 4.5 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 4.0 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 317 | 70 | 116 | 35 | 6 | 62 | 53 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 118–263 | 44.9% | 7.1 | 16.8 |
| 2P | 95–187 | 50.8% | 5.1 | 12.0 |
| 3P | 23–76 | 30.3% | 2.1 | 4.9 |
| FT | 58–80 | 72.5% | 2.2 | 5.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.2% | 53.2% | 28.9% | 30.4% | 1.87 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Elijah Crawford | BYU | 16Under 100 minutes | 5:31 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 10.4 | 33.3%† | 71.4%† | 47.8%† |
| 2026 Elijah Crawford | UIC | 21 | 25:34 | 14.0 | 2.9 | 4.9 | 21.9 | 30.0% | 72.6% | 53.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
IL Chicago · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $100K
- 80% range $40K to $275K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.0%
- team pool $630K, 80% range $280K to $1.45M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $98K to $110K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 43.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
IL Chicago: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | IL Chicago | $100Kspeculative | $40K to $275K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.3 | +3.2 to +5.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.6 | +1.7 | +4.5range +4.0 to +4.9 | 1,751 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology